At ~3:47 p.m. today. Related and here.
The Quick and the Ed A Publication of Education Sector
Published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C., The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.
Previous post: QUICK Hits
Next post: QUICK Hits
In this Education Sector video policy analyst Steve Burd discusses tax breaks that have been portrayed as a way to help middle-class families. Learn who is really benefiting from these tax breaks.
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.

{ 4 comments }
UCB Chancellor Birgeneau Loss of Credibility, Trust
The UCB budget gap has grown to $150 million, and still the Chancellor is spending money that isn’t there on expensive outside consultants. His reasons range from the need for impartiality to requiring the “innovative thinking, expertise, and new knowledge” the consultants would bring.
Does this mean that the faculty and management of a world-class research and teaching institution lack the knowledge, impartiality, innovation, and professionalism to come up with solutions? Have they been fudging their research for years? The consultants will glean their recommendations from interviewing faculty and the UCB management that hired them; yet solutions could be found internally if the Chancellor were doing the job HE was hired to do. Consultant fees would be far better spent on meeting the needs of students.
There can be only one conclusion as to why creative solutions have not been forthcoming from the professionals within UCB: Chancellor Birgeneau has lost credibility and the trust of the faculty as well as of the Academic Senate leadership that represents them. Even if the faculty agrees with the consultants’ recommendations – disagreeing might put their jobs in jeopardy – the underlying problem of lost credibility and trust will remain.
BJ Sepulveda is correct. I was referring to the nearly instantaneous rise in stock prices of publicly traded for-profit education companies following the announcement that Bob Shireman (who is seen as one of the strongest people on for-profits at the department) will depart on July 1.
I think what he is trying to say is that with the retirement of Mr. Shireman there will be a less aggressive stance against for-profits over at ED. Hence the bullishness on for-profits on Wall Street. Gross.
I think at least a few words would have been helpful here, because I have no idea what you’re trying to say.
Comments on this entry are closed.