<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jay Greene&#8217;s Long Strange Voucher Trip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickanded.com/2009/05/jay-greenes-long-strange-voucher-trip.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/05/jay-greenes-long-strange-voucher-trip.html</link>
	<description>The Quick and the Ed is an education blog published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington D.C. The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:30:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/05/jay-greenes-long-strange-voucher-trip.html/comment-page-1#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1579#comment-594</guid>
		<description>See Jay Greene&#039;s response here: http://jaypgreene.com/2009/05/14/the-negative-de-sarcasticizer/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;d also point out that it is untrue to suggest that there&#039;s &quot;just no evidence&quot; that vouchers work in terms of outcomes.  As the recent DC study shows, confirming several previous random assignment studies, vouchers do work -- they benefit at least some students and harm no one.  Indeed, there are more voucher studies showing positive effects than there are charter studies, which means that if you&#039;re concerned about &quot;evidence&quot; of &quot;outcomes,&quot; you should support vouchers over charters, not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Jay Greene&#8217;s response here: <a href="http://jaypgreene.com/2009/05/14/the-negative-de-sarcasticizer/" rel="nofollow">http://jaypgreene.com/2009/05/.....asticizer/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that it is untrue to suggest that there&#8217;s &#8220;just no evidence&#8221; that vouchers work in terms of outcomes.  As the recent DC study shows, confirming several previous random assignment studies, vouchers do work &#8212; they benefit at least some students and harm no one.  Indeed, there are more voucher studies showing positive effects than there are charter studies, which means that if you&#8217;re concerned about &#8220;evidence&#8221; of &#8220;outcomes,&#8221; you should support vouchers over charters, not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
