<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Pell Mandatory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickanded.com/2009/04/making-pell-mandatory.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/04/making-pell-mandatory.html</link>
	<description>The Quick and the Ed is an education blog published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington D.C. The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:30:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Student Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/04/making-pell-mandatory.html/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Student Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1540#comment-538</guid>
		<description>While I agree with every word in this blog, there are a few more words that need to be added.  The chart shows only the federal contribution to students&#039; financial aid packages.  State and institutional aid, which often exceed if not overwhelm the federal components, can have a larger effect on the progressivity or regressivity of the entire financial aid package.  It is the whole package that determines college affordability, not just the federal contribution toward it.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, the process is dynamic, not static.  Federal aid is largely first dollar; states and institutions can move their money after the federal amounts are determined.  After Congress established tuition tax credits and deductions for the middle class, several institutions reduced their institutional aid for this population and targeted it to the financially needy.  But that was the exception.  The history of the past two decades shows that when the federal government increases first dollar aid to the low income, institutions more typically respond by shifting their aid to &quot;merit&quot; programs, largely benefiting those whose access and retention are not at issue.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As the New York Times pointed out this week in a feature article on financial aid packaging, this process is &quot;secret&quot;.  Institutions fight hard to keep it secret even though there is already legislation on the books (Student Right to Know) that could take the process out from behind closed doors.  If Secretary Duncan is successful in increasing Pell grants and making their funding mandatory, his next step must be to make sure that the intended recipients actually benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with every word in this blog, there are a few more words that need to be added.  The chart shows only the federal contribution to students&#8217; financial aid packages.  State and institutional aid, which often exceed if not overwhelm the federal components, can have a larger effect on the progressivity or regressivity of the entire financial aid package.  It is the whole package that determines college affordability, not just the federal contribution toward it.  </p>
<p>Moreover, the process is dynamic, not static.  Federal aid is largely first dollar; states and institutions can move their money after the federal amounts are determined.  After Congress established tuition tax credits and deductions for the middle class, several institutions reduced their institutional aid for this population and targeted it to the financially needy.  But that was the exception.  The history of the past two decades shows that when the federal government increases first dollar aid to the low income, institutions more typically respond by shifting their aid to &#8220;merit&#8221; programs, largely benefiting those whose access and retention are not at issue.  </p>
<p>As the New York Times pointed out this week in a feature article on financial aid packaging, this process is &#8220;secret&#8221;.  Institutions fight hard to keep it secret even though there is already legislation on the books (Student Right to Know) that could take the process out from behind closed doors.  If Secretary Duncan is successful in increasing Pell grants and making their funding mandatory, his next step must be to make sure that the intended recipients actually benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
