<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That&#8217;s Settled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html</link>
	<description>The Quick and the Ed is an education blog published by Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington D.C. The Quick and the Ed offers in-depth analysis on the latest in education policy and research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave G.</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-451</guid>
		<description>yes, that&#039;s $25 billion per year. so you are correct that NCLB is finally &quot;fully funded&quot; for this year. But, oops, since the $13 billion for Title I in the stimulus (really only $10 billion in state grants) is spread out over two years you&#039;re actually wrong about full funding.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But hey, glad to know that you consider a one-time infusion of a year&#039;s worth of Title I money constitutes &quot;full funding&quot; and makes up for the past 7 years of inadequate investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, that&#8217;s $25 billion per year. so you are correct that NCLB is finally &#8220;fully funded&#8221; for this year. But, oops, since the $13 billion for Title I in the stimulus (really only $10 billion in state grants) is spread out over two years you&#8217;re actually wrong about full funding.</p>
<p>But hey, glad to know that you consider a one-time infusion of a year&#8217;s worth of Title I money constitutes &#8220;full funding&#8221; and makes up for the past 7 years of inadequate investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-448</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfunded mandate&quot; has always been only one concern. Equally important is the incoherent measure of student progress. Thankfully, the law is now funded as you say. Now, let&#039;s work on fine-tuning the AYP instruments to actually measure what students are learning and acknowledge real progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfunded mandate&#8221; has always been only one concern. Equally important is the incoherent measure of student progress. Thankfully, the law is now funded as you say. Now, let&#8217;s work on fine-tuning the AYP instruments to actually measure what students are learning and acknowledge real progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-447</guid>
		<description>There are those who just need to complain. I&#039;m sure the next related complaint will be that the funding is not enough for what they are expected to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are those who just need to complain. I&#8217;m sure the next related complaint will be that the funding is not enough for what they are expected to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john in nc</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>john in nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Can they have a few weeks to fix up everything before you send in the accountability inspectors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can they have a few weeks to fix up everything before you send in the accountability inspectors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-443</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure who you&#039;re talking about, here, Kevin.  Who really objected &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; on &quot;unfunded mandate&quot; grounds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure who you&#8217;re talking about, here, Kevin.  Who really objected <i>only</i> on &#8220;unfunded mandate&#8221; grounds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.quickanded.com/2009/02/thats-settled.html/comment-page-1#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickanded.com/wordpress/?p=1451#comment-440</guid>
		<description>I suppose this fits into the &quot;be careful what you wish (or beg) for&quot; column.  Your point is well taken.  Now that NCLB can be considered fully funded, there is no escaping the long arm of the regulations.  Does this now negate the arguments of fundng when NCLB is reauthorized later this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose this fits into the &#8220;be careful what you wish (or beg) for&#8221; column.  Your point is well taken.  Now that NCLB can be considered fully funded, there is no escaping the long arm of the regulations.  Does this now negate the arguments of fundng when NCLB is reauthorized later this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
