I’m sure there’s a sensible way for scholars of education to talk about Bill Ayers’ decades of work in the field and make the case that it has value and that he’s a generally nice guy. But this isn’t it. As near as I can tell they’re arguing that “unrepentant terrorist” is unfair because really it should be “unrepentant former terrorist,” in that the terrorism happened a long time ago, and really it wasn’t so much that he “bombed the Pentagon” as that he “participated passionately in the civil rights and antiwar movements of the 1960s, as did hundreds of thousands of Americans.” I’m not sure who should be more insulted: people who care about the clear meaning of words, or the hundreds of thousands of Americans who participated in the civil rights and antiwar movements? There are some ostensibly smart signatories to the statement; I find things like this to be baffling.


Kevin Carey appeared on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" to talk about the education proposals put forth during Wednesday’s State of the Union speech, including endowments, student loans, college prices and No Child Left Behind. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
Andrew Rotherham is featured in CBS's "Where America Stands," a news special on the current state of the nation's schools.
College and Career-Ready: Using Outcomes Data to Hold High Schools Accountable for Student Success
Teachers at Work: Improving Teacher Quality Through School Design 
Kevin,
You’d do well to point out that some of us were aware of Ayers and thought of him as a scoundrel long before Barack Obama was a blip on radar outside Illinois.
My opinion of Bill Ayers and his current/former work doesn’t have a thing to do with this campaign, and I’m not alone.