The Year 2 evaluation of the D.C. voucher program was released today. Given the current debate over whether the program should be funded for another year, I’m guessing this study will see a lot of spin in the next few weeks, since there’s a little something for everyone.
Those who’d like to end the program can point out that the results were, all-in-all, underwhelming, but supporters of the voucher program can point to the positive results among certain subgroups. Most notably, students from the first cohort who used the voucher scored significantly higher in reading – supporters might use this to convince lawmakers to hold out for another year or two in order to see if the effects continue for subsequent cohorts. But will a few positive results be enough to save D.C. vouchers?
Update: As Chad points out below, voucher supporters are already grabbing on to the subgroup analysis to support the voucher program. And I’ve already gotten a couple of news releases with headlines touting “academic gains” and “early successes”. For some reason, though, none of these releases mention the fact that the overall analysis of reading results did reach the 91 percent cutoff for statistical significance, but just didn’t quite make it to 95 percent. Maybe that’s just too stats-nerdy for a press release.


Kevin Carey appeared on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" to talk about the education proposals put forth during Wednesday’s State of the Union speech, including endowments, student loans, college prices and No Child Left Behind. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
Andrew Rotherham is featured in CBS's "Where America Stands," a news special on the current state of the nation's schools.
College and Career-Ready: Using Outcomes Data to Hold High Schools Accountable for Student Success
Teachers at Work: Improving Teacher Quality Through School Design 