A new report from Daria Hall at the Education Trust, my former employer (BTW, what’s the statute of limitations on that in the blogosophere, vis a vis disclosure? It’ll be two years in September, I’m thinking that’s the limit. If you agree / disagree, email)–covered here in the NYTimes–makes a point that’s not made often enough, namely that the No Child Left Behind Act’s provisions related to high school graduation rates are more or less a complete joke. In nearby Virginia, for example, the goal is 57 percent. What? How does a number like that even get chosen? Was there a conversation when some state education official said, “Hey, how about fifty-eight percent?” and somone else said, “C’mon now, these people aren’t miracle workers!”
Update: Turns out Virginia upped its target to 61 percent earlier this year, which I think moves the state from an F to a D-minus. Also, more disclosure: Education Sector co-director Andy Rotherham is a member of the Virginia Board of Education. He voted against this target, saying it was too low.


Kevin Carey appeared on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" to talk about the education proposals put forth during Wednesday’s State of the Union speech, including endowments, student loans, college prices and No Child Left Behind. He also responded to telephone calls and electronic communications.
Andrew Rotherham is featured in CBS's "Where America Stands," a news special on the current state of the nation's schools.
College and Career-Ready: Using Outcomes Data to Hold High Schools Accountable for Student Success
Teachers at Work: Improving Teacher Quality Through School Design 